The incredible size-changing "Monster Shark!"
by TheDorsalFin on Oct.26, 2009 at 8:10 pm, under Shark News Stories
Multiple media outlets have jumped on the "Monster Shark" story out of Queensland. Oddly enough, the size of the "Monster Shark," which reportedly has not actually been seen by anybody, seems to vary depending on who is reporting the story.
Mother Nature Network estimates the shark being 15′ (4.5m) in length and lists the smaller shark that was reportedly bitten by the "monster shark" as being 9′ (2.75m). Despite listing the larger shark at 15′, MNN still refers to the animal as both "gigantic" and a "monster." The article’s headline, states that the shark "terrifies" the locals, although the local quoted in the article merely makes mention of being cautious.
A Sky News report (overflowing with "monster" usage) posted by YouTube user SharkAndAnimals reports the larger animal to be over 5m (>16.5′) and that the smaller shark was 3.7m (>12′).
The Daily Mail article ups the ante (we can always count on the Daily Mail), estimating the larger shark at up to 20′ (>6m). The beauty of the Daily Mail article is that it reports the smaller shark as being 10′ (3m) early in the article, then refers to the smaller shark as being 14′ (4.25m) in the caption of a photo of the mauled shark. Of course, I would expect nothing less from an article that refers to Vic Hislop as "an internationally-recognised authority on sharks."
The 7 News video below, which adds to fear-filled reporting, was embedded in the Daily Mail article.
I sincerely have a hard time taking a "shark expert" seriously, when he makes statements to the effect of, great white sharks "will eat anything." While that kind of fear marketing might help Mr. Edwards sell more of his shark attack books, it’s far from an accurate description of typical white shark feeding habits. However, with "shark experts" proclaiming such inaccuracies as fact, it’s no wonder that the news crew was able to find a woman on the beach, who believes that if a white shark would attack a snared smaller white shark, then it would definitely attack the woman’s daughter, since she is smaller than the mauled shark.
Oh well, journalism was never about getting the facts straight…or was it?
1 Comment for this entry
3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks for this entry
-
Whale shark dies in Manila Bay - The Dorsal Fin
October 28th, 2009 on 4:44 pm[...] shark (Rhincodon typus) was found floating in Manila Bay and later died. As has been the case with another shark story in the news this week, the size of the whale shark varies depending on the source, although the [...]
-
Using Twitter as a Marketing Tool
October 31st, 2009 on 10:09 am[...] e-goal 1: no simple “lookit this” tweets, space permitting …Green Tweets « Qualisx ViewsThe incredible size-changing "Monster Shark!"Related posts on Consistent FlowProcess and advantages of buying Arizona Foreclosure Homes [...]
-
Oh no! Another “monster” great white shark! - The Dorsal Fin
December 14th, 2009 on 10:30 pm[...] like another “monster shark” in the recent media, it’s unclear what the actual size of this recent “monster shark” is. The Herald [...]
October 27th, 2009 on 1:16 pm
Classic, love the media’s take on this. Mind you “if” that was a 10 foot animal in the image, the critter taking the bites out of it was a very large beastie indeed!