The Dorsal Fin

The Courier-Mail recently posted a story titled, Monster shark spreads fear off Queensland coast, focusing on a supposed "monster" white shark, which is so large that it was able to nearly bite a 3m (approximately 10′) white shark "in half" (with two bites on alternating sides, that is). The 3m shark was bitten after it was "snared on a baited drumline." The Courier-Mail posted this picture of the 3m white shark with the bite marks from the larger shark. The article goes on to estimate the size of this "monster" to be 5m (approximately 16.5′) or more. The article also refers to the shark as a "giant" great white, when not repeatedly referring to it as a "monster shark."

Let’s take a step back into reality, shall we? 5m is not outside of the range of what would generally be considered a normal length for an adult white shark. It is hardly a "giant," relatively speaking, when it comes to white sharks. So, who is spreading the fear about a monster off the coast of Queensland? Is it the actual shark or the over-the-top sensationalized reporting about the shark?

The article goes on to discuss the controversial topic of shark nets. Aside from the unnecessary sensationalism, one thing about the article that did strike me as interesting was that it mentioned that Vic Hislop (great white shark "hunter") does not support the use of shark nets due to the overall damage they cause to the marine environment, and that he supports methods to "scare away sharks rather than capture and kill them." This comes as a bit of surprise considering some of Hislop’s statements about sharks, which were featured in a recent Edit International article.

The Daily Star (a UK "news" source) has really outdone itself with its story, Killer on a Beach, a report about a thresher shark washing ashore at Hayle Beach in Cornwall. The story is so over-the-top with ridiculous sensationalism that it would be funny, if it weren’t so pathetic. The "Killer on a Beach," title almost seems tame compared to the secondary title, "A SHARK that can decapitate a human with the lash of its tail has been found on a British beach." While there is an unconfirmed anecdotal account of a fisherman being decapitated by a breaching thresher, the source of this story probably also knew a kid in elementary school who ate Pop Rocks, while drinking Coke, and exploded. I suppose it’s possible to be decapitated by the tail of a thresher. If somebody took the time and effort they could probably decapitate a human with that plastic knife that comes with the Play-Doh Fun Factory (perhaps, Hasbro should add that as a warning). The Daily Star goes on to describe the thresher’s tail (caudal fin) as "razor-sharp." I’d invite the Daily Star Staff reporter to try to shave with the tail of a thresher. The article also notes that the thresher is a "close relative" of the great white shark, and it even goes so far as to include a photo of a great white shark merely swimming along, with the caption of "Lethal shark on the rampage."

Congratulations, The Daily Star, you are truly special!

Note: It is generally accepted that the common thresher shark (Alopias vulpinus) is not considered to be aggressive toward or dangerous to humans, although divers are cautioned to treat thresher sharks with respect (this is a general rule with all aquatic life). Injuries (non-decapitating ones) to divers have been documented as a result of being struck by the thresher’s whip-like tail, which can occur if the shark is provoked.

And the winner (or is it loser?) is…ContactMusic." Why is Contact Music reporting a story about sharks in the first place?" you might ask. Well, it’s Steven Spielberg related news, of course. He directed that shark movie back in ’75. What was it called again? Oh yes, “Jaws.” That’s the one. Hence, any story regarding great white sharks should automatically be associated with Spielberg (in the eyes of some media outlets, at least).

ContactMusic’s article, “Jaws sightings close Massachusetts Beaches,” is about as utterly ridiculous as they come. Just to clarify the headline, multiple sightings of great white sharks near the coastline are what prompted the closing of several Chatham beaches, not sightings of the movie Jaws. The article goes so far as to say that the recent white shark sightings near Chatham, Massachusetts are "terrifying residents of nearby Martha’s Vineyard" (where Jaws was filmed). Say what? Was there any reporting done to substantiate the terror has fallen upon the residents of Martha’s Vineyard? It seems that the good people of Martha’s Vineyard wouldn’t be too fazed by white shark sightings, considering that there have been white sharks reported around the Vineyard repeatedly in recent years. I guess the white sharks around Chatham are more fear-inducing than the ones that were in closer proximity to Martha’s Vineyard in the past.

Thanks for spreading unnecessary fear, ContactMusic. Now, back to reality.

On August 15, two men kayaking off the coast of Chatham, Massachusetts witnessed a shark attack on a seal. Bruce Bean and Rod MacKinnon, witnessed a bloody seal at the surface near their kayaks and a “a large black fin” nearby, according to a report at the The Boston Globe. White sharks are not unheard of in New England waters this time of year, and there is a large population of seals in the area where the men spotted the shark, so it wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to believe that a great white shark could be in the area. Greg Skomal of the Division of Marine Fisheries was quoted as saying, "We think it’s a great white shark. There’s not many species of sharks in New England that would attack a seal. It’s certainly not a new phenomenon. It’s a natural event that’s been going on for a few years." Despite it being a “natural event” that’s not a “new phenomenon,” several news agencies picked up the story and added the typical "Jaws" references and sensational reporting. It should also be noted that while white sharks are known to migrate through New England waters, the last recorded fatal shark attack in New England occurred in 1936, according to The Boston Globe report.

The story at The Boston Globe was actually fairly objective and reported the basic facts of the sighting. The Boston Herald’s version of the story, on the other hand, steps the “fear factor” up a bit, starting their report off with, "Shark experts fear a great white is lurking off Chatham’s seal-rife seas." I find it hard to believe that “shark experts” would “fear” a great white’s presence in an area where white sharks are known to be present this time of year, especially in a spot where there is an abundant source of the white shark’s natural food source. And while the Herald’s story makes the statement about the shark expert’s “fear,” it is not backed up with any information from any “shark experts” expressing fear over the situation. In fact, Skomal is also quoted in the Herald’s report as simply stating that he believed the account of Bean and MacKinnon to be credible and that the carcass of the seal would help identify the shark involved. And, yes, this is the same Greg Skomal quoted in The Boston Globe story who expressed that a white shark attacking a seal was a natural event and nothing new.

WHDH 7 Boston’s video report (Note: I could only view this video properly using Internet Explorer) really hams up the "Jaws" angle in their version of the story. My favorite part of this one is the quote from one of the women interviewed, in which she says, "It’s like out of the Syfy Channel. You know, they have Shark Week and show all the horror pictures." The fact that people out there no longer make the distinction between Discovery Channel and science fiction is a tell-tale sign of what Shark Week has become, as of late. Also worth noting is the very familiar white shark image used in the background behind the anchors in the news studio during the lead-in to the story.

Last but not least, WBZTV CBS 38 features the photo of a mako shark to go along with their report on the possible white shark sighting. WBZTV also has a video report on the story, which amazingly manages to avoid any references to "Jaws".

Last week, a story about 4 shark fishermen being rescued from “shark-infested” waters in New York was featured at various media outlets.

The charter boat that the fishermen were aboard began taking on water, and the men sent out a distress call. Fortunately, two off-duty Marine Bureau officers heard the distress call, responded to the scene, and were able to rescue the fishermen within minutes of their boat sinking.

Fox 5 News in New York ran a segment on this story, in which the threat of shark attacks was strongly emphasized. The segment also features obligatory references to Jaws.

(continue reading…)